Base Excision Repair Vs Mismatch Repair

Base Excision Repair vs. Mismatch Repair: A Deep Dive into DNA Damage Control

Maintaining the integrity of our genome is paramount for cellular survival and organismal health. Our cells are constantly bombarded with endogenous and exogenous factors that can damage DNA, leading to mutations and potentially catastrophic consequences. To combat this threat, cells have evolved sophisticated DNA repair mechanisms, and among the most crucial are base excision repair (BER) and mismatch repair (MMR). While both pathways aim to correct errors in the DNA sequence, they target different types of damage and employ distinct molecular machineries. This article will delve into the intricacies of BER and MMR, comparing and contrasting their mechanisms, substrates, and clinical significance.

Understanding Base Excision Repair (BER)

Base excision repair is a major pathway responsible for repairing a wide variety of small, non-helix-distorting base lesions. These lesions include but are not limited to:

Oxidative damage: Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated during normal cellular metabolism or external stress can cause oxidative modifications to bases, such as 8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG).
Alkylation damage: Alkylating agents can add alkyl groups to DNA bases, altering their base-pairing properties.
Deamination: Spontaneous or enzymatic deamination of cytosine to uracil is a common event that can lead to C-to-T transitions during replication.
Depurination/Depyrimidination: The loss of a purine or pyrimidine base from the sugar-phosphate backbone creates an abasic site (AP site).

The BER Pathway: A Step-by-Step Overview

The BER pathway is remarkably versatile, employing different sub-pathways depending on the type and extent of damage. However, a common thread runs through the process:

DNA Glycosylase Recognition and Removal: The process begins with a DNA glycosylase, an enzyme specific to a particular type of base lesion. The glycosylase recognizes and flips the damaged base out of the DNA helix. It then cleaves the N-glycosidic bond linking the base to the deoxyribose sugar, leaving behind an AP site.
AP Endonuclease Cleavage: An AP endonuclease (APE1 in humans) cleaves the phosphodiester bond at the 5' end of the AP site, creating a single-strand break with a 3'-hydroxyl group and a 5'-deoxyribose phosphate.
DNA Polymerase β Action (Short Patch BER): In short-patch BER, DNA polymerase β fills the single-nucleotide gap created by the AP endonuclease. This polymerase has unique lyase activity that removes the 5'-deoxyribose phosphate group. Finally, DNA ligase seals the nick.
DNA Polymerase δ/ε and Flap Endonuclease Action (Long Patch BER): For larger lesions or when more nucleotides are needed for repair, long-patch BER is employed. DNA polymerase δ or ε synthesizes a longer DNA patch (usually 2-10 nucleotides), displacing a short 5’ flap. This flap is then removed by a flap endonuclease (FEN1), and the nick is sealed by DNA ligase I.

Understanding Mismatch Repair (MMR)

Mismatch repair is a crucial pathway that corrects replication errors, primarily single-base mismatches and small insertion/deletion loops (IDLs). These errors can arise during DNA replication due to polymerase slippage or incorrect base pairing. The accumulation of MMR errors can lead to microsatellite instability (MSI), a hallmark of various cancers.

The MMR Pathway: A Detailed Look

MMR involves a multi-protein complex that identifies, excises, and resynthesizes the mismatched DNA strand. The process is more intricate than BER:

Mismatch Recognition: The MutSα heterodimer (MutSα is composed of MutS homolog 2 (MSH2) and MutS homolog 6 (MSH6) in humans) recognizes and binds to the mismatch. MutSβ (MSH2 and MSH3) can also recognize larger insertion/deletion loops.
Strand Discrimination: MMR systems must differentiate between the newly synthesized strand containing the error and the parental strand. This is crucial to ensure the correct strand is repaired. In eukaryotes, strand discrimination involves the recognition of nicks or gaps in the newly synthesized lagging strand. PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and other factors can also contribute to strand identification.
Excision of the Mismatched Region: After strand identification, the MutLα complex (MutL homolog 1 (MLH1) and PMS2) is recruited. MutLα interacts with the exonuclease EXO1 or other nucleases, creating a single-stranded gap extending past the mismatch. This ensures the removal of the error-containing sequence.
Resynthesis and Ligation: DNA polymerase δ or ε resynthesizes the removed region, using the parental strand as a template. Finally, DNA ligase seals the nick, completing the repair.

BER vs. MMR: A Comparative Analysis

Feature	Base Excision Repair (BER)	Mismatch Repair (MMR)
Type of Damage	Small, non-helix-distorting base lesions	Single-base mismatches, small insertion/deletion loops
Initiating Enzyme	DNA glycosylase	MutSα or MutSβ
Strand Discrimination	Not required	Required
Repair Mechanism	Excision of damaged base, single-nucleotide or short-patch synthesis, ligation	Excision of a longer region, resynthesis, ligation
Pathway Complexity	Relatively simple	More complex
Clinical Significance	Neurological disorders, cancer	Cancer predisposition (Lynch syndrome)
Main Enzymes	DNA glycosylases, APE1, DNA polymerase β, DNA ligase III	MutSα/β, MutLα, EXO1, DNA polymerase δ/ε, DNA ligase I

Clinical Relevance of BER and MMR Defects

Defects in both BER and MMR pathways have significant clinical implications, most notably in the development of cancer.

BER Deficiencies and Cancer

Impaired BER function can lead to the accumulation of oxidative DNA damage, increasing genomic instability and potentially contributing to cancer development. While not as directly linked to cancer predisposition syndromes as MMR defects, deficiencies in specific BER proteins have been associated with an increased risk of various cancers.

MMR Deficiencies and Cancer

Defects in MMR genes are strongly associated with hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer (Lynch syndrome), the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer. Lynch syndrome is characterized by microsatellite instability (MSI), due to the inability to correct replication errors in repetitive DNA sequences. MMR defects are also implicated in other cancers, including endometrial, ovarian, and gastric cancers.

Conclusion

Base excision repair and mismatch repair are essential DNA repair pathways that protect our genome from the constant onslaught of damaging agents. BER handles small, non-helix-distorting lesions, while MMR targets replication errors. Both pathways are critical for maintaining genomic stability, and defects in either can lead to increased mutation rates and cancer risk. Further research into these intricate processes is crucial for understanding their roles in human health and disease, and for developing new therapeutic strategies targeting cancer and other genetic disorders. The complexity and importance of these pathways highlight the intricate mechanisms that cells employ to maintain the integrity of their genetic information, ultimately ensuring the survival and proper functioning of the organism. Further research continues to unravel the subtle complexities of these processes, promising new avenues for preventative and therapeutic interventions. The continued exploration of BER and MMR is vital for advancing our understanding of genomic stability, disease pathogenesis, and ultimately, human health. The relationship between these pathways and aging, environmental factors, and specific diseases remains an area of active and essential investigation.

Base Excision Repair Vs Mismatch Repair

Table of Contents